Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1085-1090.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2026.08.009
Tingting LIU1,2(
), Mengxue HU1,2, Yaru LIU1,2, Chong YE1,2, Quan XIA1,2,*(
)
Received:2024-12-20
Revised:2025-03-26
Online:2026-08-26
Published:2026-09-09
Contact:
Quan XIA
E-mail:908810474@qq.com;xiaquan2010@163.com
CLC Number:
Tingting LIU, Mengxue HU, Yaru LIU, Chong YE, Quan XIA. Effect of bicyclol in abnormal liver function induced by chemotherapy in gynecologic tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(8): 1085-1090.
| Groups | n | Age (years) | Weight (kg) | Course (years) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 54.20±10.59 | 59.55±10.70 | 1.50±1.74 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 49.35±8.96 | 61.99±12.37 | 1.40±1.64 |
| t | - | |||
| P | - |
Table 1 The baseline data between dicyclol and glycyrrhizin groups ($ \overline x $±s)
| Groups | n | Age (years) | Weight (kg) | Course (years) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 54.20±10.59 | 59.55±10.70 | 1.50±1.74 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 49.35±8.96 | 61.99±12.37 | 1.40±1.64 |
| t | - | |||
| P | - |
| Groups | n | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 24.35±12.65 | 25.85±11.70 | 49.85±68.48 | 115.60±110.73 | 11.15±4.01 | 2.12±0.96 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 28.45±23.46 | 30.80±21.89 | 42.50±30.20 | 174.05±306.00 | 13.10±10.48 | 3.09±5.20 |
| t | - | ||||||
| P | - |
Table 2 The liver function indexes before chemotherapy ($ \overline x $±s)
| Groups | n | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 24.35±12.65 | 25.85±11.70 | 49.85±68.48 | 115.60±110.73 | 11.15±4.01 | 2.12±0.96 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 28.45±23.46 | 30.80±21.89 | 42.50±30.20 | 174.05±306.00 | 13.10±10.48 | 3.09±5.20 |
| t | - | ||||||
| P | - |
| Groups | n | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 50.00±24.39 | 46.15±24.71 | 87.84±81.95 | 145.84±135.55 | 12.68±4.95 | 2.52±1.14 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 70.70±54.76 | 63.05±34.43 | 67.85±57.64 | 169.05±263.23 | 13.14±7.10 | 2.76±2.05 |
| t | - | ||||||
| P | - |
Table 3 The liver function indexes after chemotherapy ($ \overline x $±s)
| Groups | n | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 50.00±24.39 | 46.15±24.71 | 87.84±81.95 | 145.84±135.55 | 12.68±4.95 | 2.52±1.14 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 70.70±54.76 | 63.05±34.43 | 67.85±57.64 | 169.05±263.23 | 13.14±7.10 | 2.76±2.05 |
| t | - | ||||||
| P | - |
| Time | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Before chemotherapy | 24.35±12.65 | 25.85±11.70 | 49.85±68.48 | 115.60±110.73 | 11.15±4.01 | 2.12±0.96 |
| After chemotherapy | 50.00±24.39c | 46.15±24.71c | 87.84±81.95 | 145.84±135.55 | 12.68±4.95 | 2.52±1.14 |
| After treatment | 28.15±18.83f | 32.50±15.91e | 66.00±65.59 | 117.35±123.79 | 13.08±5.33 | 2.36±1.10 |
Table 4 The effect of bicyclol on liver function indexes ($ \overline x $±s, n=20)
| Time | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Before chemotherapy | 24.35±12.65 | 25.85±11.70 | 49.85±68.48 | 115.60±110.73 | 11.15±4.01 | 2.12±0.96 |
| After chemotherapy | 50.00±24.39c | 46.15±24.71c | 87.84±81.95 | 145.84±135.55 | 12.68±4.95 | 2.52±1.14 |
| After treatment | 28.15±18.83f | 32.50±15.91e | 66.00±65.59 | 117.35±123.79 | 13.08±5.33 | 2.36±1.10 |
| Time | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Before chemotherapy | 28.45±23.46 | 30.80±21.89 | 42.50±30.20 | 174.05±306.00 | 13.10±10.48 | 3.09±5.20 |
| After chemotherapy | 70.70±54.76c | 63.05±34.43c | 67.85±57.64 | 169.05±263.23 | 13.14±7.10 | 2.76±2.05 |
| After treatment | 55.15±48.19 | 48.85±33.99 | 66.45±52.32 | 146.85±109.38 | 11.88±7.18 | 2.60±2.89 |
Table 5 The effect of glycyrrhizin on liver function indexes ($ \overline x $±s, n=20)
| Time | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Before chemotherapy | 28.45±23.46 | 30.80±21.89 | 42.50±30.20 | 174.05±306.00 | 13.10±10.48 | 3.09±5.20 |
| After chemotherapy | 70.70±54.76c | 63.05±34.43c | 67.85±57.64 | 169.05±263.23 | 13.14±7.10 | 2.76±2.05 |
| After treatment | 55.15±48.19 | 48.85±33.99 | 66.45±52.32 | 146.85±109.38 | 11.88±7.18 | 2.60±2.89 |
| Groups | n | Cured | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective | Total effective rate |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 80.00% |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 65.00% |
| P | - | - | - | - | - |
Table 6 The total effective rate of the two drugs
| Groups | n | Cured | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective | Total effective rate |
| Dicyclol | 20 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 80.00% |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 65.00% |
| P | - | - | - | - | - |
| Groups | n | Time | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | After treatment | 28.15±18.83b | 32.50±15.91 | 66.00±65.59 | 117.35±123.79 | 13.08±5.33 | 2.36±1.10 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | After treatment | 55.15±48.19 | 48.85±33.99 | 66.45±52.32 | 146.85±109.38 | 11.88±7.18 | 2.60±2.89 |
| t | - | - | ||||||
| P | - | - |
Table 7 The difference effects between two drugs on liver function indexes ($ \overline x $±s)
| Groups | n | Time | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | ALP (U/L) | TBIL (μmol/L) | DBIL (μmol/L) |
| Dicyclol | 20 | After treatment | 28.15±18.83b | 32.50±15.91 | 66.00±65.59 | 117.35±123.79 | 13.08±5.33 | 2.36±1.10 |
| Glycyrrhizin | 20 | After treatment | 55.15±48.19 | 48.85±33.99 | 66.45±52.32 | 146.85±109.38 | 11.88±7.18 | 2.60±2.89 |
| t | - | - | ||||||
| P | - | - |
| 1 | 杨钦磊, 韩秋惠, 魏小娟. 紫杉醇脂质体与紫杉醇注射液治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效及安全性比较[J]. 临床合理用药, 2024, 17 (1): 31- 34. |
| 2 |
Li M, Luo Q, Tao Y, et al. Pharmacotherapies for drug-induced liver injury: a current literature review[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 12, 806249.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.806249 |
| 3 | 马世武, 刘成海, 刘晓琰, 等. 中国药物性肝损伤诊治指南 (2023年版)[J]. 胃肠病学, 2023, 28 (7): 397- 431. |
| 4 |
Andrade RJ, Chalasani N, Björnsson ES, et al. Drug-induced liver injury[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2019, 5 (1): 58.
doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0105-0 |
| 5 | 陈永芳. 双环醇对抗结核药物所致肝损伤的临床分析[J]. 北方药学, 2018, 15 (12): 68- 69. |
| 6 |
Li X, Tang J, Mao Y. Incidence and risk factors of drug-induced liver injury[J]. Liver Int, 2022, 42 (9): 1999- 2014.
doi: 10.1111/liv.15262 |
| 7 | 邹红, 祁硕, 李丹丹, 等. 基于肝脏药物代谢酶CYP450表达探讨鸦胆子苦醇对裸鼠的肝毒性研究[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2025, 30 (8): 1049- 1057. |
| 8 | 张腾. 乱用药物的恶果—急性肝衰竭[J]. 食品与健康, 2024, 36 (1): 32- 33. |
| 9 | 陆雨佳, 区可滢, 马越洋, 等. UGT1A1多态性与UGT1A1抑制药物相关药物性肝损伤的关系[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41 (4): 588- 593. |
| 10 |
Chen K, Yang R, Shen FQ, et al. Advances in pharmacological activities and mechanisms of glycyrrhizic acid[J]. Curr Med Che, 2020, 27 (36): 6219- 6243.
doi: 10.2174/0929867325666191011115407 |
| 11 |
Huo X, Meng X, Zhang J, et al. Hepatoprotective effect of different combinations of 18α-and 18β-Glycyrrhizic acid against CCl4-induced liver injury in rats[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2020, 122, 109354.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109354 |
| 12 | 谢雯, 于乐成. 双环醇临床应用专家共识—2020版[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14 (3): 177- 185. |
| 13 |
Zhao T, Mao L, Yu Z, et al. Therapeutic potential of bicyclol in liver diseases: Lessons from a synthetic drug based on herbal derivative in traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2021, 91, 107308.
doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107308 |
| 14 | 曾乌查, 林学德, 张志锋, 等. 双环醇片防治肿瘤化疗药物性肝损害的研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2011, 18 (17): 5- 6. |
| 15 | 佟欣, 樊华. 双环醇治疗胃癌化疗所致肝损伤患者肝功能指标的变化[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2018, 21 (4): 625- 626. |
| 16 | 葛蓉, 王建宁. 探讨应用双环醇治疗胃癌化疗所致肝损伤患者的效果[J]. 心理月刊, 2019, 14 (23): 196. |
| 17 | 唐武兵, 杨文, 伍楚蓉, 等. 双环醇片在乳腺癌化疗中防治肝损害的临床研究[J]. 广东医学, 2014, 35 (17): 2753- 2756. |
| 18 | 陈丽君, 方伟. 双环醇抗脓毒症诱导的小鼠暴发性肝炎作用及机制研究[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2024, 29 (11): 1249- 1259. |
| 19 | 刘宁, 李芳芳, 张丹, 等. 双环醇抗炎作用机制研究[J]. 中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2016, 30 (10): 1031- 1032. |
| 20 | 李虎, 李健蕊, 刘楠楠, 等. 双环醇通过抑制线粒体凋亡途径缓解TNF-α/D-GalN诱导的爆发性肝损伤[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2021, 37 (4): 478- 484. |
| [1] | Feng YANG, Wei SHI, Huiling WANG, Zitong ZHENG. Ginkgetin suppresses proliferation and migration of triple-negative breast cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis via the GPX4/OTUB1 axis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(7): 865-874. |
| [2] | Shouyan HE, Minjun LIU, Cong WAN, Buzhen TAN. Research progress of PARP inhibitors therapy for endometrial cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2026, 31(4): 536-542. |
| [3] | HAN Xue, WANG Dan, LIU Huiling. Research progress of targeted nanoparticles in the treatment of cervical cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(11): 1569-1577. |
| [4] |
LI Shanshan, WEI Dandan, KANG Hanyu, LIU Xiaopeng, YAN Shuxun, JIANG Shiqing.
Research progress on the clinical application and mechanism of commonly used traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of breast cancer
[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(7): 977-983.
|
| [5] | QIAN Hanxu, ZHAO Yaxuan, YANG Yang, ZHANG Yin. Drug resistance of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2025, 30(1): 100-109. |
| [6] | PANG Lili, HU Ying, LUO Jie, TU Qin, CHEN Min. Study of the mechanism of combretastatin a-4 derivative LGD5 induced G2/M cycle arrest and apoptosis in human cervical cancer HeLa cells [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(10): 1100-1109. |
| [7] | WANG Dan, ZHANG Wenyan, LUO Renjie, CHEN Yuanjing, HAN Xue, QU Bo, FENG Shifang, NIE Xiazi, LIU Huiling. Research progress of molecular docking in screening anti-cervical cancer drugs [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(8): 955-960. |
| [8] | DU Caiying, QUAN Xianghua, SUN Caihong, YUAN Haidan. Research progress of dalpiciclib in treatment of breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(6): 715-720. |
| [9] | ZHU Chengcheng, LUO Yonghong, DING Jin, CHENG Huixian, NI Guantai. Application of pneumoperitoneum-free single-hole endoscopy combined with ropivacaine in pregnancy with ovarian tumor [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(5): 561-568. |
| [10] | WU Guilan, LIU Jia, SUN Hong. Construction of a column-line graph for predicting the probability of survival in early-stage elderly HER2-positive breast cancer based on the SEER database [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(3): 283-295. |
| [11] | ZHOU Ying, WANG Liqun. Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel albumin assisted platinum chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer based on tumor factors and inflammatory status [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(2): 164-170. |
| [12] | ZHANG Liyi, GUO Zifen. Research advance in progesterone therapy for endometrial cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(2): 230-235. |
| [13] | ZHANG Wei, WANG Hongyuan, LEI Xiaohang, ZHAO Yingshuai, LV Weichao, ZHANG Jianguo. BCG + piroxicam versus BCG + gemcitabine for prevention of postoperative recurrence in intermediate- and high-risk bladder cancer and effects on serum AGR and PON1 [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2023, 28(10): 1146-1153. |
| [14] | HE Lihua, ZHU Xiuzhi, JIANG Yizhou. Research progress on immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2023, 28(8): 842-853. |
| [15] | ZHANG Huyunlong, ZHU Xiuzhi, JIN Xi, SHAO Zhimin. Mechanisms of endocrine-resistance and therapeutic breakthroughs in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2023, 28(8): 854-865. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||