中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 872-871.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-03

• 科研论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

0~3岁感觉信息处理初始量表的信效度及临床应用研究

何彦璐1,2,杨志勇2,区嘉欣1,王晶1,池霞2,童梅玲2,许光旭3   

  1. 1 南京医科大学,江苏 南京 210004;
    2 南京医科大学附属妇产医院,江苏 南京 210004;
    3 南京医科大学第一附属医院康复医学中心,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-09-10 出版日期:2017-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 许光旭,E-mail:xuguangxu1@126.com
  • 作者简介:何彦璐(1987-),女,江苏人,主管康复治疗师,硕士在读,主要研究方向为儿童康复
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000204-6);国家自然科学基金面上项目(81671359);2017年度儿童早期发展适宜技术研究项目(2017FYE001)

Research on reliability,validity and clinical application of the initial sensory profile (0~3 years)

HE Yan-lu1,2,YANG Zhi-yong2,OU Jia-xin1,WANG Jing1,CHI Xia2,TONG Mei-ling2,XU Guang-xu2   

  1. 1 Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210004,China;
    2 Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210004,China;
    3 Rehabilitation Medicine Center,First Affiliateal Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210029,China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10
  • Contact: XU Guang-xu,E-mail:xuguangxu1@126.com

PDF

摘要： 目的 引进0~3岁感觉信息处理量表,分析其信度和效度及门诊体检儿童的感觉信息处理能力。方法 以378名0~3岁门诊体检儿童为样本,由其主要带养人填写量表,评价量表的信度和效度,并分析样本的感觉信息处理能力。结果 量表0~6月和7~36月信度分别为0.720和0.871,重测信度为0.659。效度的KMO值分别为0.646和0.772。 7~36月量表采用主成分分析法,各维度均在可接受范围内,量表总分与各分项目得分的相关系数在0.371~0.856间。门诊体检儿童各感觉系统的确定偏差检出率为2.4%~13.2%,感觉反应阈值四个维度确定偏差检出率为4.0%~11.7%。结论 0~3岁感觉信息处理能力量表具有良好的信度和效度,且与英文原版量表的研究结果基本相符,可进一步研究并在临床推广运用。

关键词: 感觉信息处理, 心理测量学, 信度, 效度, 临床应用

Abstract: Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of the sensory profile (0~3 years) and the ability of infants/toddlers sensory processing.Methods A total of 378 children's caregivers completed the sensory profile to evaluate the reliability,validity and the ability of sensory processing.Results The Cronbach's α coefficient for both sections (0~6 months and 7~36 months) of the sensory profile were 0.720 and 0.871.The test-retest reliability was 0.659.The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy were 0.646 and 0.772.Using principal component analysis (pca),all dimensions were within the acceptable range,the correlation coefficient between total score and each item score ranged from 0.371 to 0.856.The rate of definite difference of sensory processing sections was 2.4%~13.2%.The rate of definite difference of sensory profile quadrants was 4.0%~11.7%.Conclusions The reliability and validity of the sensory profile is satisfactory and the results are consistent with the English version of the scale.It can be further studied and applied in clinic.

Key words: sensory profile, psychometrics, reliability, validity, clinical application

中图分类号: 

陕ICP备10008342号-1
　 网站版权所有 © 《中国儿童保健杂志》编辑部
地址：西安市西五路中段157号　邮编：710004 电话：029-87679391　 Email：zgetbjzz@126.com
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司