早期评估及干预在高危儿随访中的临床价值分析

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-0760

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 1369-1373.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2020-0760

早期评估及干预在高危儿随访中的临床价值分析

张艳^1,2, 李业平³, 刘苓²

1 皖南医学院人文与管理学院,安徽芜湖 241002;
2 芜湖市第二人民医院临床心理科,安徽芜湖 241000;
3 芜湖市第四人民医院司法鉴定科, 安徽芜湖 241003

收稿日期:2020-04-24 修回日期:2020-07-01 发布日期:2020-12-10 出版日期:2020-12-10
通讯作者: 李业平,E-mail:571729260@qq.com
作者简介:张艳(1980-),女,安徽人,心理治疗师,硕士研究生在读,主要研究方向为司法精神病学和临床心理学。
基金资助:
安徽省芜湖市科技攻关计划项目(2011卫生14-1)

Analysis of the clinical value of early assessment and intervention in the follow-up of high-risk infants

ZHANG Yan^1,2, LI Ye-ping³, LIU Ling²

1 School of Humanities and Management, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui 241002, China;
2 Department of Clinical Psychology, the Second People′s Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China;
3 Judicial Expertise Department, the Fourth People′s Hospital of Wuhu, Wuhu, Anhui 241003, China

Received:2020-04-24 Revised:2020-07-01 Online:2020-12-10 Published:2020-12-10
Contact: LI Ye-ping,E-mail: 571729260@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析早期评估及干预在高危儿随访中的临床价值,为高危儿随访及干预提供新模式。方法选取2010年10月-2016年10月芜湖市第二人民医院儿童保健科门诊随访的160例高危儿,进行扭动阶段和不安阶段的全身运动(GMs)质量评估、月龄满3个月后运用0～6岁小儿神经心理发育检查表(简称“儿-心”)定期测试发育商(DQ),随访至12月龄以上以临床诊断与随访评估结果明确其神经发育结局。对评估结果异常的实施早期干预。采用自身对照研究观察临床效果,分析两种评估结果的相关性及早期神经运动发育异常的相关影响因素。结果 1)神经学发育结局:发育正常59例(36.8%),发育偏离58例(36.3%),发育迟缓32例(20%),脑瘫11例(6.9%);2)干预前后扭动运动阶段GMs评估结果比较,差异有统计学意义(χ²= 35.367,P<0.01);3)干预后高危儿的DQ明显高于干预前,差异有统计学意义(t=-4.593, P<0.01);4)GMs评估结果与“儿-心”量表得分均显著相关(P<0.05或<0.01);5)扭动运动阶段评估异常的高危因素为低出生体重(OR=7.650,95%CI:1.129～51.813,P=0.037)、缺氧缺血性脑病(OR=2.656,95%CI:1.158～6.089,P＝0.027)、脑损伤(OR=2.123,95%CI:1.017～4.434,P＝0.045)和早产(OR=2.405,95%CI:1.126～5.133,P＝0.023)。结论运用全身运动质量评估结合“儿-心”量表进行早期评估,有助于预测高危儿神经学发育结局,并且对高危儿早期干预起指导作用。

关键词: 高危儿, 早期干预, 神经发育, 全身运动质量评估

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of early assessment and intervention in the follow-up of high-risk infants, so as to provide a new model for follow-up and intervention of high-risk infants. Methods Totally 160 high-risk children in Child Health Department of Wuhu Second People′s Hospital were selected to perform General Movements assessment (GMs) in writhing stage and restless stage from October 2010 to October 2016.When infants were 3 months old, the developmental quotient (DQ) was regularly tested by the 0-6 Years Old Pediatric Examination Table of Neuropsychological Development (pediatric neuropsychological table for short).The neurodevelopmental outcomes of these children were confirmed by clinical diagnosis and follow-up evaluations after 12 months old.Then early intervention was performed in children with abnormal results.The self-control study was designed to observe the clinical effect, and the correlation between the two evaluation results and the related factors of early neuromotor development abnormality were analyzed. Results 1) In terms of neurological developmental outcomes, there were 59(36.8%) cases of normal development, 58(36.3%) cases of developmental deviation,32(20%) cases of developmental delay, and 11(6.9%) cases of cerebral palsy.2)The GMs evaluation result of the writhing movements stage before and after the early intervention was significantly different (χ²=35.367, P<0.01).3) Children′s DQ after intervention was significantly higher than that before intervention (t=-4.593, P<0.01).4) GMs assessment results was significantly related to the score of Pediatric Neuropsychological Scale (P<0.05 or<0.01).5) Logistic regression analysis showed that the high risk factors of abnormal evaluation result in the twisting stage included low birth weight(OR=7.650,95%CI:1.129-51.813,P＝0.037), hypoxic ischemicen cephalopatly(OR=2.656,95%CI:1.158-6.089,P＝0.021), brain injury (OR=2.123,95%CI:1.017-4.434,P＝0.045) and premature birth (OR=2.405,95%CI:1.126-5.133,P＝0.023). Conclusion Combination of GMs assessment and Pediatric Neuropsychological Scale is helpful to predict the neurological development outcomes of high-risk infants, which plays a guiding role in early intervention of high-risk infants.

Key words: high-risk infants, early intervention, neurodevelopment, general movements assessment

中图分类号:

R473.72

张艳, 李业平, 刘苓. 早期评估及干预在高危儿随访中的临床价值分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1369-1373.

ZHANG Yan, LI Ye-ping, LIU Ling. Analysis of the clinical value of early assessment and intervention in the follow-up of high-risk infants[J]. journal1, 2020, 28(12): 1369-1373.

参考文献

[1] Olivieri I, Bova SM, Urgesi C, et al.Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants: what′s new in the third millennium? Neuropsychological profiles at four years[J].Early Hum Dev, 2012,88(4):241-250.
[2] Mathur A, Inder T.Magnetic resonance imaging--insights into brain injury and outcomes in premature infants[J].J Commun Disord, 2009,42(4):248-255.
[3] 刘世佳.基于家庭—社区—医院三方联动的高危儿早期干预模式效果评价研究[D].济南:山东大学, 2018.
[4] 张怡文, 郭津.高危儿早期干预的理论基础及干预策略的研究进展[J].中国康复, 2019,34(2):101-104.
[5] Einspieler C,Prechtl HF.Prechtl′s assessment of general movements:a dignostic tool for the function assessment of the young nervous system[J].Ment Retard Dev Disabil Resrev, 2005,11(1):61-67.
[6] 杨红, 邵肖梅, 王艺, 等.全身运动质量评估的直接法和录像法的信度研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2008(3):260-261.
[7] 彭慧, 聂立伟.0～6岁小儿神经心理发育量表评估1岁内康复患儿的信度研究[J].华北煤炭医学院学报, 2009,11(5):631-632.
[8] 史惟,杨红,施炳培,等.国内外脑性瘫痪定义、临床分型及功能分级新进展[J].中国康复理论与实践,2009,15(9):801.
[9] 鲍秀兰.0～3岁儿童最佳的人生开端--中国宝宝早期教育与潜能开发指南[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2006:237-267, 343-357.
[10] Prechtl HF.General movement assessment as a method of developmental neurology: new paradigms and their consequences.The 1999 Ronnie MacKeith lecture[J].Dev Med Child Neurol, 2001,43(12):836-842.
[11] 张良芬, 闻芳.北京市2889例8月龄婴儿智力发育筛查结果及影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究, 2017,28(2):105-107.
[12] 张立梅, 付海霞, 王秀英, 等.1798例8月龄婴儿智能发育筛查结果分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究, 2017,28(6):726-728.
[13] 林玲莉, 陈海苑, 黄洁纯.早期干预与健康教育相结合预防高危儿脑瘫等后遗症的疗效[J].中国现代药物应用, 2018,12(15):175-176.
[14] Byrne R, Noritz G,Maitre NL.Implementation of early diagnosis and intervention guidelines for cerebral palsy in a high-risk infant follow-up clinic[J].Pediatr Neurol, 2017,76:66-71.
[15] Maitre NL, Chorna O, Romeo DM, et al.Implementation of the hammersmith infant neurological examination in a high-risk infant follow-up program[J].Pediatr Neurol, 2016,65:31-38.
[16] 王玲玲, 温晓红.不同神经学评估工具及其对脑瘫预测效度的研究进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2017,25(4):375-377.
[17] 谭娜, 韩东明, 闫瑞芳, 等.MRI多序列扫描在小儿脑瘫康复治疗期间中应用研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2017,15(4):3-5.
[18] 庞宗林, 尉琳琳.颅脑MRI和全身运动质量评估对极早产儿的运动发育结局的预测作用[J].中国儿童保健杂志, 2018,26(5):525-528.
[19] Slaughter LA, Bonfante-Mejia E, Hintz SR, et al.Early conventional mri for prediction of neurodevelopmental impairment in extremely-low-birth-weight infants[J].Neonatology, 2016,110(1):47-54.
[20] 钟银莉, 吴新华, 罗灿, 等.用LMS法建立新生儿出生体重、身长、头围参考曲线[J].广东医学, 2018,39(17):2609-2618.
[21] 袁红, 毛美玲, 杨世娥, 等.全身运动质量评估在高危儿随访及神经损伤康复中的应用研究[J].中国实用医药, 2016,11(24):277-278.
[22] Einspieler C, Bos AF, Libertus ME, et al.The general movement assessment helps us to identify preterm infants at risk for cognitive dysfunction[J].Front Psychol, 2016,7:406.
[23] 陈恕青, 张立文, 邓素娟.0～1岁小儿神经心理发育测评及早期干预的临床研究[J].中国医学创新, 2018,15(7):114-116.
[24] 周晓玉,钱家萍,许植之,等.早期干预对高危儿预后影响的研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2001,39(10):616-619.
[25] 梁玉琼,李晓捷,陈美慧.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类(儿童和青少年版)》在儿童康复中的应用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2019,34(2):224-228.
[26] 刘芸,黄高贵.全身运动质量评估结果在早产儿超早期康复处置方案指标制定中的应用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2017,32(2):223-225.

早期评估及干预在高危儿随访中的临床价值分析

Analysis of the clinical value of early assessment and intervention in the follow-up of high-risk infants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李嘉, 张延赤. 维生素D受体基因多态性及维生素D水平与神经发育障碍关系的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 516-520.
[2]	刘佳敏, 赵莎, 钟燕. 外泌体与儿童神经精神障碍的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(5): 521-525.
[3]	王晓庆, 刘九月, 姚光. 小于胎龄儿早期脑发育及18~24月龄时神经发育状况的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 353-358.
[4]	夏正龙, 宋燕燕. 支气管肺发育不良早产儿神经发育研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 390-394.
[5]	王娜, 李晓莺. 早产儿神经发育评估的进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 404-407.
[6]	王慧, 王丽娟, 童连, 汪军, 张雅萍, 张卿. 母亲生育年龄及喂养行为与高危儿早期运动发育的相关分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 422-426.
[7]	陈峰, 张宇. 多胞胎和单胞胎早产儿神经发育的回顾性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 451-456.
[8]	林欢喜, 刘潘婷, 童梅玲, 池霞, 钱君, 洪琴. 父母介导的干预在孤独症谱系障碍治疗中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(3): 304-310.
[9]	黄亨烨, 于广军. 婴幼儿早期神经发育评估诊断量表的综述[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 162-166.
[10]	沈修姝, 汪军. 全身运动评估的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 167-170.
[11]	陈亦儒, 陈文雄. KIF5C基因突变导致神经发育障碍研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 171-175.
[12]	梅练妮, 胡纯纯, 徐琼. 脆性X综合征药物治疗进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 180-184.
[13]	曹冰冰, 林多华, 杜佩珍, 颜陶, 程建婷. 多种实验室指标和炎性因子表达水平与新生儿神经发育的相关性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(2): 205-209.
[14]	陈玉霞, 刘华艳, 范倩倩. 足月儿高胆红素血症神经元特异性烯醇化酶、经皮小时胆红素、总胆红素/白蛋白水平变化及与远期神经发育的相关性[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 86-90.
[15]	王惠萍, 王莉, 高琼, 白铂亮, 马颖君. 极低出生体重坏死性小肠结肠炎患儿体格及神经发育的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(1): 96-100.