儿童发育性协调障碍问卷中文版的应用研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-12-09

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (12): 1260-1263.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-12-09

儿童发育性协调障碍问卷中文版的应用研究

朱庆庆¹,古桂雄²,花静¹

1 同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院妇幼保健部,上海 201204;
2 苏州大学儿科研究所,江苏苏州 213001

收稿日期:2014-12-02 发布日期:2015-12-10 出版日期:2015-12-10
通讯作者: 花静,E-mailszhuaj@hotmail.com
作者简介:朱庆庆(1979-),女,主治医师,医学硕士,主要研究方向为儿童保健。
基金资助:
国家自然科学青年基金(81402687);上海市科学技术委员会引导类课题(14411970900,15495810500);浦东新区卫生和技术委员会联合攻关项目(PW2013D-9)

Study on application of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-Chinese version.

ZHU Qing-qing¹,GU Gui-xiong²,HUA Jing¹.

1 Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai 201204,China;
2 Pediatrics Research Institution of Suzhou University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 213001,China

Received:2014-12-02 Online:2015-12-10 Published:2015-12-10
Contact: HUA Jing,E-mail:szhuai@hotmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的进行发育性协调障碍问卷中文版(DCDQ-C)的信效度评价,为进一步在中国大陆地区开展发育性协调障碍早期筛查提供有效的筛查工具。方法苏州市区的10所幼儿园共3 316名儿童纳入研究。采用Cronbach' α系数来确定内部一致性信度,Person相关系数评价DCDQ-C的重测信度,项目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)评价内容效度。探索性因素分析来检验DCDQ-C测试的结构效度。采用工作者曲线(ROC)下面积分析DCDQ-C的诊断价值。结果 DCDQ-C内部一致性(所有项目Cronbach' α值均>0.85)和重测信度(13项相关系数均在0.9以上)都非常高。所有项目的I-CVI均>0.78,表明DCDQ-C内容的可靠性价高。探索性因素分析的因子载荷基本均在0.7以上,提示DCDQ-C的结构效度较高。DCDQ-C的ROC曲线下面积与0.5具有统计学差异(P<0.05),但曲线下面积不高(0.641),去除低年龄组后ROC曲线下面积略有增加。结论中文版本的DCDQ在中国儿童中应用性较好,但在小年龄段的学龄前儿童使用时仍需谨慎。

关键词: 发展性协调障碍, 发育性运动协调障碍问卷2007版, 信度, 效度, 中国大陆地区

Abstract: Objective To examine the reliability and validity of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-Chinese version(DCDQ-C),and to provide an effective population-based screening tool for developmental coordination disorder.Methods A total of 3 316 children from 10 nursery schools in Suzhou city of mainland China were involved in the study.Cronbach'α was used to determine internal consistency.Test-retest reliability of the MABC-2 was estimated using Pearson Correlation Coefficieynt.The content validity was evaluated by the item-level content validity index (I-CVI).Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the construct validity of the MABC-2 test.Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to measure the Area Under Curve (AUC) value of the DCDQ-C as a screening instrument.Results The Results showed that both internal consistency (Cronbach'α value of all items were above 0.85) and test-retest reliability (13 items were above 0.9) were excellent.I-CVIs of all items were above 0.78,and suggested a fair content reliability of DCDQ-C.Exploratory factor analysis showed that almost all factor loadings of each items were above 0.7,and indicated a satisfactory construct validity.ROC analysis shows a comparative small AUC (0.641).Conclusions The Chinese version of the DCDQ has satisfactory internal consistency and reliability.However,it should be cautioned when used in younger preschool children.

Key words: developmental coordination disorder, Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-Chinese version, reliability, validity, mainland China

中图分类号:

R174

朱庆庆,古桂雄,花静. 儿童发育性协调障碍问卷中文版的应用研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2015, 23(12): 1260-1263.

ZHU Qing-qing,GU Gui-xiong,HUA Jing.. Study on application of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-Chinese version.[J]. journal1, 2015, 23(12): 1260-1263.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu41.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgetbjzz/CN/10.11852/zgetbjzz2015-23-12-09

https://manu41.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgetbjzz/CN/Y2015/V23/I12/1260

参考文献

[1] Lingam R,Hunt L,Golding J,et al.Prevalence of developmental coordination disorder using the DSM-Ⅳ at 7 years of age:a UK population-based study[J].Pediatrics,2009,123:693-700.
[2] Cairney J,Missiuna C,Veldhuizen S,et al.Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for parents (DCD-Q):Results from a community based study of school-aged children[J].Human Movement Science,2008,27:932-940.
[3] Pannekoek L,Rigoli D,Piek J,et al.The revised DCDQ:Is it a suitable screening measure for motor difficulties in adolescents?[J].Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,2012,29:81-97.
[4] Wilson BN,Crawford SG,Green D,et al.Psychometric properties of the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire[J].Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics,2009,29(2):182-202.
[5] Tseng MH,Fu CP,Wilson BN,et al.Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire in community-based children[J].ResDev Disabil,2010,31(1):33-45.
[6] Beaton DE,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al.Guidelinesfor the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J].Spine,2000,25(24):3186-3191.
[7] Henderson SE,Sugden DA,Barnett AL.Movement assessment battery for children-second edition[Movement ABC-2][M].London,UK:The Psychological Corporation,2007.
[8] Pannekoek L,Rigoli D,Piek J,et al.The revised DCDQ:Is it a suitable screening measure for motor difficulties in adolescents?[J].Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,2012,29:81-97.
[9] Cairney J,Missiuna C,Veldhuizen S,et al.Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for parents (DCD-Q):Results from a community based study of school-aged children[J].Human Movement Science,2008,27:932-940.
[10] Prado MSS,Magalhaes LC,Wilson BN.Cross-cultural adaptation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for Brazilian children[J].Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy,2009,13(3):236-243.
[11] Parmar A,Kwan M,Rodriguez C.Psychometric properties of the DCD-Q-07 in children ages to 4-6[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities,2014,35:330-339.
[12] Caravale B,Baldi S,Gasparini C,et al.Cross-cultural adaptation,reliability and predictive validity of the Italian version of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ)[J].European Journal of Paediatric Neurology,2014,18:267-272.
[13] Rihtman T,Wilson BN,Parush S.Development of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for preschools and preliminary evidence of its psychometric properties in Israel[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities,2011,32:1378-1387.

[1]	尹晓辉, 王葳, 张姣姣, 王洋, 许亚红. 父亲参与婴儿教养量表的汉化[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(4): 369-373.
[2]	张显达, 李雪, 廖敏. 3~6岁儿童汉语语言发育评估量表-语法篇的信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 822-827.
[3]	贾妮, 许梦雪, 丁美琦, 严双琴, 章青兰, 王宝珍, 李园园, 关宏岩. 中文版亲子互动-喂养量表的信效度初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(8): 839-844.
[4]	王佳, 黄静, 梁亚红, 席静, 王艳艳. 青少年直觉进食量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 553-557.
[5]	郑瑞璇, 章丽丽, 周自云, 曹佳妍, 周星, 钱雨倩, 堵飞宇, 程灶火. 婴幼儿孤独症筛查问卷的初步编制和信效度分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 376-380.
[6]	肖婷, 肖湘, 储康康, 柯晓燕. 中文版量化的婴幼儿孤独症筛查量表信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 381-385.
[7]	黄楹, 张海峰, 童连. 婴幼儿回应性照护评价量表的初步编制与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(4): 386-391.
[8]	张晶, 卞晓燕, SQUIRES Jane, 宋魏, 彭咏梅, 杜莉, 朱丽萍. 年龄与发育进程问卷:社会-情绪(第2版)中文版的效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(3): 249-253.
[9]	文竹, 李焱, 林裕雄, 孙智信, 江文庆. 认知缓慢特质量表中文版修订及信效度评估[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1297-1303.
[10]	王晓娟, 许梦雪, 张梦楠, 任霞, 江媛媛, 张雪娇, 杨琳, 吴建新, 张霆, 朱宗涵, 关宏岩. 学龄前儿童园外运动行为问卷的初步编制及信效度研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1304-1308.
[11]	孙亚茹, 刘婷, 尹翠艳, 王欣, 牛玉硕, 李葵南, 杨秀玲. 儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1063-1067.
[12]	冯围围, 王惠珊, 张彤, 杨玉凤, 许志飞, 潘晓平, 王广海, 徐韬, 中国婴幼儿睡眠状况评估量表常模制定工作协作组. 中国婴儿睡眠状况评估量表的信效度验证及全国常模构建[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(10): 1073-1077.
[13]	何彦璐, 解雅春, 刘丰, 陈玮锭, 杨志勇, 张光宝, 洪琴, 池霞, 童梅玲. 3～6岁儿童基本运动能力评估量表信度和效度的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(8): 848-851.
[14]	殷珂, 张婷, 宋志霄, 张莉, 乔秀芸, 李燕. 婴儿饮食行为量表的编制与评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(6): 650-654.
[15]	冯围围, 潘晓平, 王惠珊, 张悦, 金曦, 黄小娜, 徐韬, 张彤, 中国婴幼儿睡眠状况评估量表编制研究省级协作组. 中国婴儿睡眠状况评估量表的编制与评价研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(5): 468-472.

儿童发育性协调障碍问卷中文版的应用研究

Study on application of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-Chinese version.

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics