journal1 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7): 779-781.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-07-37

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Intervention effect of the health education path on common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children.

LI Hai-bo, LI Xin, LI Li, YAN Xiao-yan, SUN Hui   

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei United University, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, China
  • Received:2014-02-12 Online:2014-07-10 Published:2014-07-10

健康教育路径在常见喘息性疾病患儿住院期间的应用效果

李海波, 李鑫, 李丽, 闫晓燕, 孙慧   

  1. 河北联合大学附属医院儿科, 河北 唐山 063000
  • 作者简介:李海波(1974-), 女, 河北人, 主管护师 , 研究方向为儿科护理。
  • 基金资助:
    唐山市科技厅(121302069a)

Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect of the health education path in common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children, and provide a scientific basis for improving and promoting the health of children. Methods A total of 200 children were randomly divided into intervention and control groups during the period from January to June, 2013.The intervention group were treated by the health education path, while the control group treated by the traditional way of health education.And the effect of the two groups was compared. Results The results of hospitalization of children in the intervention group (5.52±1.26)d was shorter than the control group (6.53±1.29)d, inhalation method score (7.00±1.84) was higher than the control group (5.90±1.98).Mental status (38%) was better than the control group (25%), knowledge level of the parents of children (52%) was higher than the control group (18%), nursing satisfaction (80%) was also higher (65 %) than control group (P=0.000). Conclusion The application effect of the health education path in common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children is obvious, and improving the health of children.

Key words: health education path, children, common pediatric asthmatic diseases, intervention

摘要: 目的 探讨健康教育路径在小儿常见喘息性疾病患儿住院期间治疗护理中的应用效果, 为改善和促进患儿健康提供科学依据。方法 将2013年1-6月在河北联合大学附属医院儿科住院的200例喘息性疾病患儿, 按单双日分为干预组和对照组, 每组100例。对照组采用传统健康教育方式, 干预组采用健康教育路径, 比较两组患儿的护理效果。结果 干预组患儿住院时间[(5.52±1.26)d]比对照组[(6.53±1.29) d]明显缩短, 吸入方法得分干预组(7.00±1.84)比对照组(5.90±1.98)明显提高, 精神状况(38%)比对照组(25%)有所改善、患儿家长知识掌握度(52%)好于对照组(18%)、护理满意度(80%)亦高于对照组(65%), 差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论 健康教育路径在常见喘息性疾病患儿治疗护理中的应用效果明显, 促进其健康。

关键词: 健康教育路径, 小儿, 常见喘息性疾病, 干预

CLC Number: