Welcome to Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,Today is Chinese

Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics ›› 2026, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1064-1069.doi: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2026.08.006

Previous Articles    

Evaluation of the in vitro antibacterial activity and mutant prevention potential of three quinolone antibiotics

Kaiping LUO1,2(), Jie XU3, Xianfeng ZHANG3, Xin SHI1,*(), Yongfu HANG1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China
    2. School of Pharmacy, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China
    3. Center of Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2025-12-30 Revised:2026-02-24 Online:2026-08-26 Published:2026-09-09
  • Contact: Xin SHI,Yongfu HANG E-mail:20245226037@stu.suda.edu.cn;306828072@qq.com;hangyongfu1986@163.com

Abstract:

AIM: To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial efficacy of three quinolones—nemonoxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin—against Gram-positive (G+) and Gram-negative (G?) bacteria, providing a scientific basis for rational clinical use. METHODS: Drug susceptibility tests were conducted on 292 clinical isolates (including Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecium, Corynebacterium striatum, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii) using the broth microdilution method to compare the distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of selected strains was further determined by the agar dilution method to evaluate their mutant prevention capabilities. RESULTS: For G+ bacteria, nemonoxacin exhibited superior activity against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC90=16 μg/mL), Staphylococcus epidermidis (MIC90=2 μg/mL), and Corynebacterium striatum (MIC90=4 μg/mL) compared to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. In MRSA strains, the susceptibility rate of nemonoxacin reached 66.96%. For G? bacteria, the MIC90 of levofloxacin against P. aeruginosa was 2 μg/mL, which was lower than that of nemonoxacin and moxifloxacin (both 4 μg/mL). For K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and A. baumannii, the MIC90 values for all three drugs were mostly 64 μg/mL, indicating overall low susceptibility. In terms of mutant prevention, nemonoxacin showed an MPC90 of 2 μg/mL in MSSA, which was lower than that of moxifloxacin (4 μg/mL) and levofloxacin (16 μg/mL), with the narrowest range of selection index (SI). In resistant G bacteria, the MPC90 and SI values for all three drugs were generally higher. However, the MPC90 of levofloxacin against resistant P. aeruginosa (16 μg/mL) was lower than that of moxifloxacin (32 μg/mL) and nemonoxacin (64 μg/mL). CONCLUSION: Nemonoxacin demonstrates stronger antibacterial activity against G+ bacteria such as S. aureus (including MRSA) and possesses the most potent mutant prevention capability in MSSA. Levofloxacin maintains favorable antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, and its MPC is relatively lower among the tested drugs. Clinical selection should be based on the specific pathogen type and the risk of resistance.

Key words: nemonoxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, minimum inhibitory concentration, mutant prevention concentration

CLC Number: