Study on the neonatal outcomes and the intelligence development of children with assisted conception

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-05-05

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To compare the neonatal outcomes and the intelligence development at 8 years old in children born after assisted conception with a control group of children conceived naturally.Methods A prospective control study was performed. The experimental group were children born after assisted conception, the control group were children born after natural conception. The mothers were invited to participate at 28 weeks of gestation and were followed up to delivery.Related data were collected and registered by trained professionals.The children of two groups were followed up to 8 years old. A formal developmental assessment was conducted with the CDCC Scales of Children Development when they were under 3 years old and a formal intelligence assessment was done with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Tests when they were over 3 years old. Results Inthe assisted conception group, the incidence rates of twins preterm birth, low birth weight and admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit(NICU) were significantly higher than those of the control group.But these differences seemed to disappear when only singletonswere compared between the two groups.And the differences were not significant on neonatal outcomes in infants conceived by different Methods of assisted conception (IVF-ET、ICSI、FET). No statistically significantdifferences werefound in the intelligence development at 8 years old between the experimental group and the control group. Conclusions Neonatal outcomes after assisted conception is worse than natural conception, mainly due to the large proportion of multifetal births after assisted conception. Followed up to 8 years old, the level of intelligence development in children born after assisted conception is normal.And the growth and development of the offsprings by using different ways of assisted conception are similiar.

Key words: assisted conception, neonatal outcomes, intelligence development, control study

摘要： 目的通过研究辅助受孕儿出生时的新生情况及持续追踪至8岁的智力发育水平,以评价辅助生殖技术的安全性。方法采用前瞻性对照研究方法,试验组为人工辅助受孕儿,对照组为自然受孕儿,均自母亲孕28周起入组登记定期随访收集相关资料至出生,生后由经过培训的指定专业人员将相关新生儿情况登记入案,并定期跟踪,0~3岁采用CDCC婴幼儿发育量表,每间隔6个月进行一次精神运动发育评估,3岁以上采用斯坦福-比奈智力量表,每间隔12 个月进行一次智力测试。结果辅助受孕组新生儿中双胎儿、早产、低出生体重、新生儿期入住NICU等发生率明显高于自然受孕对照组,单独比较两组中的单胎儿时,差异无统计学意义。但辅助受孕组剖宫产发生率仍明显高于自然受孕组。另对不同辅助受孕方式产生的子代组间进行比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。持续追踪两组儿童至8岁,其智力发育水平差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论辅助受孕子代的新生儿情况更差,主要归因于其高发的双胎及多胎妊娠率;辅助受孕儿童生长至学龄时智力发育水平正常;不同辅助受孕方式对其子代的出生情况及智力发育无影响。

关键词: 辅助受孕, 新生儿情况, 智力发育, 对照研究

CLC Number:

R179

ZHAO Qian, Li Hong, FENG Cui-lian, ZHANG Qing-xue, CHEN Jing. Study on the neonatal outcomes and the intelligence development of children with assisted conception[J]. journal1, 2018, 26(5): 479-482.

赵倩, 李宏, 冯翠莲, 张清学, 陈静. 辅助受孕儿的出生情况及智力发育水平追踪研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(5): 479-482.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu41.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgetbjzz/EN/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-05-05

https://manu41.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgetbjzz/EN/Y2018/V26/I5/479

References

[1] Wisborg K,Ingerslev HJ,Henriksen TB. In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery,low birth weight,and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit:a prospective follow-up study[J]. Fertil Steril,2010,94(6):2102-2106.
[2] Wisborg K,Ingerslev HJ,Henriksen TB. IVF and stillbirth: a prospective follow-up study[J]. Hum Reprod,2010,25(5): 1312-1316.
[3] Reefhuis J,Honeinl MA,Schievel LA,et al. Assisted reproductive technologhies and major structural birth defects in the United States[J]. Hum Reprod,2009,24(2):360-366.
[4] Wen J,Jiang J,Ding C,et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis[J].Fertil Steril. 2012,97(6):1331-1337.
[5] Henningsen AK,Pinborg A,Lidegaard Ø,et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study[J]. Fertil Steril. 2011,95(3):959-963.
[6] Marino JL, Moore VM, Wiuson KJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes by mode of assisted conception and sub-fertility in an Australian data linkage cohort[J]. PLoS One,2014,9(1): e80398.
[7] Rimm AA,Katayama AC,Katayama KP. A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet,2011,28(8):699-705.
[8] Davies MJ,Moore VM,Willson KJ,et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects[J].N Engl J Med,2012,366(19):1803-1813.
[9] Romundstad LB,Romundstad PR,Sunde A,et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilization:a population-based cohort study[J]. lancet,2008,372(9640):737-743.
[10] Pinborg A,Loft A,Aaris Henningsen AK,et al. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish national cohort Study 1995-2006[J]. Fertil Steril,2010,94(4): 1320-1327.
[11] Sazonova A,Källen K,Thurin-Kjellberg A,et al. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos[J]. Hum Reprod,2012,27:1343-1350.
[12] Wennerholm UB,Henningsen AK,Romundstad LB,et al. Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group[J]. Hum Reprod,2013,28(9):2545-2553.
[13] Maheshwari A,Pandi S,Shetty A,et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril,2012,98:368-377.
[14] Knoester M,Vandenbroucke JP, Helmerhorst FM,et al. Matched follow-up study of 5-8 year old ICSI-singletons:comparison of their neuromotor development to IVF and naturally conceived singletons[J]. Hum Reprod, 2007,22(6):1638-1646.
[15] Ludwig A,Katalinic A,Thyen U,et al. Neuromotor development and mental health at 5.5 years of age of singletons born atterm after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection ICSI:results of a prospective controlled single-blinded study in Germany[J]. Fertil Steril,2009,91(1):125-132.
[16] Xing LF,Qu F,Qian YL,et al. The social adaptation of children born after ICSI compared with IVF-conceived children: a study from China[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2011,31(8):751-753.